Discussion about this post

User's avatar
natsclop's avatar

Frustrating result, but realistic. The bats are improving, the offense is there. Pitching, I ask those questioning the bullpen construction: what is there to do?

“Spend money.” On who? Nevermind the fact that all reliever FA contracts are inherently risky investments—contracts are a two way affair. What’s the manner in which you (1) convince players to choose a team embarking on the first year of a rebuild, and (2) shell out above average money to get an extra, what, meaningless 2 wins? You wanna throw $5 million at Kirby Yates to maybe win a game? The Mets threw a million at Lovelady after we cut him, and he’s already throwing away games. If we’re 15 out of the Wild Card or 16, what’s the difference?

Trade? Chip away at the very farm that we’re trying to build up? If players aren’t being sent away for arms, it’s a binary of Toboni sees something worth keeping, or more harshly, there’s nothing to be earned in return. This bullpen will be a combination of whatever Rizzo “developed” and left us (aka, close to nothing) and waiver claims.

Call it salty, call it sore loser, but I have no interest in whatever brand of baseball the Dodgers are selling. Mercenary ball is simply not what I find attractive when I choose to watch baseball. There is nothing exciting to me about a reliever market where an arm like Diaz costs you $23 million. Development is what this sport is about, and the results of this new regime won’t be an instant success in 9 games. And with that said, there’s already been so many results of marked improvement.

Nats Fan in Exile's avatar

Dodgers have great hitters, true. They also have great pitchers and yet this Nats offense scored a lot of runs - enough to expect to win a game - consistently through this series and all year really. Very impressive and hopeful sign.

54 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?